All Issue

2020 Vol.11, Issue 1 Preview Page

General Article


March 2020. pp. 29-44
Abstract


References
1 

L. Steg and C. Vlek, Encouraging Pro-Environmental Behaviour: An Integrative Review and Research Agenda, Journal of Environmental Psychology. 29 (2009). pp. 309-317.

10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.10.004
2 

D. Cave, The end of Australia as we know it, The New York Times, 2020 15 February.

3 

F. Robles, Puerto Rico spend 11 months turning the power back on. They finally got to her, The New York Times, 2018 14 August.

4 

R. Minder, Powerful winter storm in Spain kills at least 10, The New York Times, 2020 23 January.

5 

T. Arango, T. Fuller, J.A. Del Real, and J. Healy, With California ablaze, firefighters strain to keep up, The New York Times, 2019 28 October.

6 

M. Bender, An earth law solution to ocean plastic pollution, Earth Law Center, 2018 9 March.

7 

R.E. O'Connor, R.J. Bord, and A. Fisher, Risk perceptions, general environmental beliefs, and willingness to address climate change, Risk Analysis. 19(3) (1999). pp. 461-471.

10.1111/j.1539-6924.1999.tb00421.x
8 

L. Toma and E. Mathijs, Environmental risk perception, environmental concern and propensity to participate in organic farming programmes, Journal of Environmental Management. 83(2) 2007. pp. 145-157.

10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.02.00416697103
9 

I. Fritsche, E. Jonas, D.N. Kayser, and N. Koranyi, Existential Threat and Complicance with Pro- Environmental Norms, Journal of Environmental Psychology. 30(1) 2010. pp. 67-79.

10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.08.007
10 

L. Keele, Social Capital and the Dynamics of Trust in Government, American Journal of Political Science. 51(2) (2007). pp. 241-254.

10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00248.x
11 

N. Popovich, L. Albeck-Ripka, and K. Pierre-Louis, Enviromental rules on the way out under Trump, The New York Times. 2018 28 December.

12 

M. Greshko, L. Parker, B.C. Howard, D. Stone, A. Borunda, and S. Gibbens, A running list of how president Trump is changing environmental policy, National Geographic. 2019 11 April.

13 

E. Lipton and L. Friedman, Oil was central in decision to shrink Bears Ears Monument, emails show, The New York Times. 2018 2 March.

14 

C. Krauss, Trump sings orders to speed up oil and gas pipeline construction, The New York Times. 2019 10 April.

15 

A. Bandura, Social Cognitive Theory: An Agentic Perspective, Annual Review of Psychology. 52 (2001). pp. 1-26. p.1.

10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.111148297
16 

A. Bandura, Social Cognitive Theory of Mass Communication, Mediapsychology. 3 (2001). pp. 265-299.

10.1207/S1532785XMEP0303_03
17 

S. Solomon, J. Greenberg, and T. Pyszczynski, The Cultural Animal: Twenty Years of Terror Management Theory and Research. In J. Greenberg, S.L. Koole, and T. Pyszczynski (Eds.), Handbook of experimental existential psychology, pp. 13-34. 2004, New York: Guilford Press.

10.1037/e631532007-001
18 

E. Becker, The denial of death. 1973, New York: Free Press.

19 

I.H. Langford, An Existential Approach to Risk Perception, Risk Analysis. 22 (2002). pp. 101-120.

10.1111/0272-4332.t01-1-0000912017353
20 

M. Vess and J. Arndt, The Nature of Death and the Death of Nature: the Impact of Mortality Salience on Environmental Concern, Journal of Research in Personality. 42 (2008). pp. 1376-1380.

10.1016/j.jrp.2008.04.007
21 

M. Baldassare and C. Katz, The Personal Threat of Environmental Problems as Predictor of Environmental Practices, Environment and Behavior. 29(4) (1992). pp. 602-616.

10.1177/0013916592245002
22 

A. Fisher, G. McClelland, W. Schulze, and J. Doyle, Communicating the Risk from Radon, Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association. 41(11) (1991). pp. 1440-1445.

10.1080/10473289.1991.104669401789953
23 

G. Liobikienė and R. Juknys, The Role of Values, Environmental Risk Perception, Awareness of Consequences, and Willingness to Assume Responsibility for Environmentally-Friendly Behaviour: the Lithuanian Case, Journal of Cleaner Production. 112(4) (2016). pp. 3413-3422.

10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.049
24 

L. Toma and E. Mathijs, Environmental risk perception, environmental concern and propensity to participate in organic farming programmes, Journal of Environmental Management. 83(2) 2007. pp. 145-157.

10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.02.00416697103
25 

A. Marsh and M. Kaase, Measuring Political Action. In S.H. Barnes, M. Kaase et al., Political action: Mass participation in five western democracies. 1979, Beverly Hills: Sage Publication.

26 

C. Pateman, Participation and democratic theory. 1970, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p.25.

10.1017/CBO9780511720444
27 

R. Mason, Participatory and workplace democracy. 1982, Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.

28 

A. Campbell, G. Gurin, and W.E. Miller, The voter decides. 1954, New York: Row, Peterson, and Co.

29 

S.C. Craig and M.A. Maggiotto, Measuring political efficacy, Political Methology. 8(3) (1982). pp. 85-109.

30 

S.E. Finkel, Reciprocal Effectis of Participation and Political Efficacy: A Panel Analysis, American Journal of Political Science. 29(4) 1985. pp. 891-913.

10.2307/2111186
31 

D. Brunori, State tax policy: A primer (4th eds). 2016, New York: Rowman & Littlefield.

32 

D.E. Sanger, Chemical leak in Korea brings forth a new era, The New York Times. 1991 16 April.

33 

T. Bernauer and V. Koubi, Effects of Political Institutions on Air Quality, Ecological Economics. 68(5) (2009). pp. 1355-1365.

10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.09.003
34 

B.L.M Levy and M.T. Zint, Toward Fostering Environmental Political Participation: Framing an Agenda for Environmental Education Research, Environmental Education Research. 19(5) (2013). pp. 553-576.

10.1080/13504622.2012.717218
35 

A. Bandura, Social foundations of though and action: A social cognitive theory. 1986, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

36 

A. Bandura, The Evolution of Social Cognitive Theory. In K.G. Smith, and M.A. Hitt (eds.), Great minds in management. (pp. 9-35). 2005, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

37 

K. Ikeda, T. Kobayashi, and M. Hoshimoto, Does Political Participation Make a Difference? The Relationship between Political Choice, Civic Engagement and Political Efficacy, Electoral Studies. 27 (2008). pp. 77-88.

10.1016/j.electstud.2007.11.004
38 

J. Kim, J. Kang, S. Kim, C. Kim, W. Park, Y. Lee, S. Choi, and S. Kim, Korean General Social Survey 2003-2016. 2017, Seoul, Korea: Sungkyunkwan University.

39 

J.P. Wanous and M.J. Hudy, Single-Item Reliability: A Replication and Extension, Organizational Research Methods. 4(4) (2001). pp. 361-375.

10.1177/109442810144003
40 

J.P. Wanous, A.E. Reichers, and M.J. Hudy, Overall Job Satisfaction: How Good Are Single-Item Measures?, Journal of Applied Psychology. 82(2). pp. 247-252.

10.1037/0021-9010.82.2.2479109282
41 

I. Ajzen and M. Fishbein, Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. 1980, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

42 

A. Meyer, Heterogeneity in the Preferences and Pro-Environmental Behavior of College Students: the Effects of Years on Campus, Demographics, and External Factors, Journal of Cleaner Production. 112 (2016). pp. 3451-3463.

10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.133
43 

A.M. McCright, The Effects of Gender on Climate Change Knowledge and Concern in the American Public, Population and Environment. 32(1) (2010). pp. 66-87.

10.1007/s11111-010-0113-1
44 

C. Xiao and A.M. McCright, Gender Differences in Environmental Concern: Revisiting the Institutional Trust Hypothesis in the USA, Environment and Behavior. 47(1) (2015). pp. 17-37.

10.1177/0013916513491571
45 

M. Fairbrother, Rich People, Poor People, and Environmental Concern: Evidence across Nations and Time, European Sociological Review. 29(5) (2013). pp. 910-922.

10.1093/esr/jcs068
46 

V. Corral-Verdugo, M. Frias-Amenta, and D. Gonzalez-Lomelí, On the Relationship between Antisocial and Anti-Environmental Behaviors: An Empirical Study, Population and Enviornment. 24 (2003). pp. 273-286.

10.1023/A:1021251128081
47 

R.E. Dunlap, C. Xiao, and A.M. McCright, Politics and Environment in America: Partisan and Ideological Cleavages in Public Support for Environmentalism, Environmental Politics. 10(4) (2001). pp. 23-48.

10.1080/714000580
48 

M. Dresner, C. Handelman, S. Braun, and G. Rollwagen-Bollens, Environmental Identity, Pro-Environmental Behaviors, and Civic Engagement of Volunteer Stewards in Portland Area Parks, Environmental Education Research. 21(7) (2015). pp. 991-1010.

10.1080/13504622.2014.964188
49 

M.J. Hetherington and T.J. Rudolph, Why Washington won't work: Polarization, political trust, and the governing crisis. 2015, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

10.7208/chicago/9780226299358.001.0001
50 

A. Kollmuss and J. Agyeman, Mind the Gap: Why Do People Act Environmentally and What Are the Barriers to Pro-Environmental Behavior? Environmental Education Research. 8(3) (2002). pp. 239-260.

10.1080/13504620220145401
51 

J.C. Bradley, T.M. Wallczek, and J.M. Zajicek, Relationship between Environmental Knowledge and Environmental Attitude of High School Students, The Journal of Environmental Education. 30(3). pp. 17-21.

10.1080/00958969909601873
52 

J. Long, Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. 1997, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

53 

A. Fullerton and J. Dixon, Generational conflict or methodological artifact? Reconsidering the relationship between age and policy attitudes in the U.S., 1984-2008, Public Opinion Quarterly. 74(4) (2010). pp. 643-673.

10.1093/poq/nfq043
54 

E.H. Kirby, and K. Kawashima-Ginsberg, The Youth Vote in 2008, The Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement.

Information
  • Publisher :Sustainable Building Research Center (ERC) Innovative Durable Building and Infrastructure Research Center
  • Publisher(Ko) :건설구조물 내구성혁신 연구센터
  • Journal Title :International Journal of Sustainable Building Technology and Urban Development
  • Journal Title(Ko) :None
  • Volume : 11
  • No :1
  • Pages :29-44
  • Received Date :2020. 02. 27
  • Accepted Date : 2020. 03. 28
Journal Informaiton International Journal of Sustainable Building Technology and Urban Development International Journal of Sustainable Building Technology and Urban Development
  • NRF
  • KOFST
  • scopus
  • crosscheck
  • open access
  • orcid
  • KISTI Cited-by
  • KISTI Current Status
  • ccl
Journal Informaiton Journal Informaiton - close