Article | . 2018 Vol. 9, Issue. 1
Variation in physico-mechanical characteristics of Kota Sandstone, under different environmental conditions



Sr. Design Engineer, Heavy Civil Infrastructure, Larsen & Toubro Ltd1
Department of Geology, School of Physical Sciences, Sikkim University2
Department of Civil Engineering, The NorthCap University3
Department of Civil Engineering, Kumaraguru College of Technology4




2018.. 31:41


PDF XML




The problem of acute scarcity of aggregate materials for building construction, pavements and rail ballast can be solved using soft rock materials (sedimentary rocks) which have sufficient strength and durability characteristics equivalent to hard rocks. But it is important to analyze the physico-mechanical behavior of rocks in detail before recommending them for any type of constructional works, as their properties are adversely affected if they are exposed to alkaline and acidic conditions for long durations. In the present study, Kota Sandstone, which is a widely available stone in the region of Rajasthan, India but not a preferred aggregate material due to strength and durability concerns, was analysed. Several physical and mechanical properties like porosity, compressive strength, tensile strength, ultrasonic pulse velocity and durability of Kota Sandstone was measured. The results indicated that under different soaking conditions, Kota Sandstone bears similar strength and durability characteristics as basalt which is of the hardest and most preferred aggregate material. The findings of the study may help construction industry to utilize the outcomes of the study and use Kota Sandstone as a preferred aggregate material and also reduce the expensive quarrying of hard rocks.



1. Sharma, P.K., Manoj Khandelwal, and T.N. Singh, Variation on physico-mechanical properties of Kota stone under different watery environments, Building and Environment, 42 (12), 2007, pp. 4117-412.  

2. IS: 10050-1981, Method for determination of slake durability Index of rocks, Indian Standard, 1981.  

3. Yang, S.Q., P. Xu, Y.-B. Li, and Y.-H. Huang, Experimental investigation on triaxial mechanical and permeability behavior of sandstone after exposure to different high temperature treatments, Geothermics, 69, 2017, pp. 93-109.  

4. Zhao, Z., J. Yang, D. Zhou, and Y. Chen, Experimental investigation on the wetting-induced weakening of sandstone joints, Engineering Geology (2017), Available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2017.04.008.  

5. M. Farrokhrouz and M.R. Asef, Experimental investigation for predicting compressive strength of sandstone, Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 43, 2017, pp. 222-229. Available at https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jngse.2017.03.023.  

6. Ramamurthy, T. and Arora, V.K., Strength predictions for jointed rocks in confined and unconfined states, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences and Geomechanics Abstracts, (1994a), 31 (1), 1994, pp. 9-22.  

7. Ramamurthy, T. and Arora, V.K., Strength predictions for jointed rocks in confined and unconfined states, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences and Geomechanics Abstracts, (1994b), 31 (1), 1994, pp. 9-22.  

8. Rao, K.S., Rao, G.V., and Ramamurthy, T., Strength of sandstones in saturated and partially saturated conditions, Geotech Eng, 18 (1), 1987, pp. 99-127.  

9. Mahmutog˘lu, Y., The effects of strain rate and saturation on a micro-cracked marble, Engineering Geology, 82, 2006, pp. 137-144.  

10. Okubo, S., Fukui, K., and Qi, Q., Uniaxial compression and tension tests of anthracite and loading rate dependence of peak strength, International Journal of Coal Geology, 68, 2006, pp. 196-204.  

11. Li, Y., Da, H., and Li, X., Strain rate dependency of coarse crystal marble under uniaxial compression: strength, deformation and strain energy, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 47 (4), 2014, pp. 1153-1164.  

12. Qian, Q., Qi, C., and Wang, M., Dynamic strength of rocks and physical nature of rock strength, Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 1 (1), 2009, pp. 1-10.  

13. Fuenkajorn, K. and Kenkhunthod, N., Influence of loading rate on deformability and compressive strength of three thai sandstones, Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 28, 2010, pp. 707-715.  

14. IS: 9179-1979 (Reaffirmed 2001), Method of preparation of rock specimen for laboratory testing, Indian Standard, 1979.  

15. ASTM D2845-08, Standard test method for laboratory determination of pulse velocity and ultrasonic elastic Constants of Rocks, 2008.  

16. J.A. Franklin and R. Chandra, The slake-durability test, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts (1972), 9 (3), pp. 325-328. Available at https://doi.org/10.1016/0148- 9062(72)90001-0.  

17. IS: 8764- 1998 (Reaffirmed 2008), Method for Determination of Point Load Strength Index of Rocks, Indian Standard, 2008.  

18. IS: 10082 -1981 (Reaffirmed 2001), Method of Test for Determination of Tensile Strength by Indirect Tests on Rock Specimens, Indian Standard, 2001.  

19. Y.V. Ramana and B. Venkatanarayana, Laboratory studies on kolar rocks, Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech. Abstract, 10, 1973, pp. 465-489.  

20. R.D. Lama and V.S. Vutukuri, Handbook on mechanical properties of rocks, Trans Tech Publications, 2, Clausthal, Germany, 1978.  

21. A. Malik, Experimental and numerical studies on dynamic stress-strain behavior of deccan trap rocks under high strain rates, department of civil engineering, (M.Tech Thesis) Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi, 2016.  



online submission
online submission
online submission
online submission
online submission
Sub Menu
Sub Banner
Sub Banner
Sub Menu
Sub Banner
Sub Banner
Sub Banner
Sub Banner
Sub Menu
Sub Menu